Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.icmbio.gov.br/handle/cecav/2466
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLima, Luanne Helena Augusto-
dc.contributor.authorMagioli, Marcelo-
dc.contributor.authorSaranholi, Bruno H.-
dc.contributor.authorConcone, Henrique Villas Boas-
dc.contributor.authorCôrtes, Lara Gomes-
dc.contributor.authorBerlinck, Christian Niel-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T22:05:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T22:05:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.other10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v14i4.2558pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.icmbio.gov.br/handle/cecav/2466-
dc.description.abstractThe environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a methodology that, from environmental samples such as soil, water, air, and others, enables the simultaneous identification of multiple species, thus allowing for large-scale mapping of biological diversity in a specific study area. Due to its non-invasive sampling approach, where species are detected from the traces they leave in the environment, eliminating the need to isolate and capture organisms, eDNA metabarcoding emerges as a valuable tool in conservation strategies. This study aims to explore the use of eDNA methodology for biodiversity monitoring and environmental impact assessment caused by the 2020 megafire in the Pantanal of Brazil, focusing on vertebrates. Environmental samples were collected at two protected areas and their surrounding areas, Taiamã Ecological Station (TES) and Pantanal Matogrossense National Park (PMNP), Mato Grosso, Brazil. We identified in TES, 27 mammals, 56 fishes, 12 birds, 4 amphibians, and 4 reptiles, while in PMNP, 43 mammals, 45 fishes, 126 birds, 19 amphibians, and 11 reptiles. Soil sampling proved to be more efficient compared to water sampling: 26 species were exclusively identified in soil samples, while 9 were attributed to water samples. Here, we demonstrated that the primer 12SV5 only a superior efficacy in identifying mammal and herpetofauna species compared to the other markers used (16Smam and MiBird). Moreover, we confirmed the complementary role of eDNA alongside camera trapping, and its advantage to estimate species richness with a single field expedition. We stress the need to optimize sample collection methods for the target group and to reduce the influence of contamination and water flow. This study highlights the importance of eDNA methodology as a crucial tool for biodiversity monitoring and environmental impact assessment, enabling rapid access to biodiversity and long-term monitoring.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherBiodivers. Bras.pt_BR
dc.subjectBiodiversidadept_BR
dc.subjectmonitoramentopt_BR
dc.subjectconservaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectDNA ambientalpt_BR
dc.titleAssessing Pantanal fauna through environmental DNA metabarcoding after the 2020 megafirept_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.volume14pt_BR
dc.citationLima, et al. Assessing Pantanal fauna through environmental DNA metabarcoding after the 2020 megafire. Biodivers. Bras., v. 14, n. 4, p.56-68, 2024. doi: 10.37002/biodiversidadebrasileira.v14i4.2558pt_BR
dc.initialpage56pt_BR
dc.finalpage68pt_BR
dc.localofdeposithttps://revistaeletronica.icmbio.gov.br/index.php/BioBR/article/view/2558pt_BR
dc.date.accessed2024-01-15-
dc.event.uf(outra)pt_BR
dc.totalpage12pt_BR
dc.number4pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Livros e Publicações

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.